Yup, I'm afraid so.
Whether you are being paid for your time and companionship, for
providing a massage, for sexual services, or simply to tie a naked
client to your coal bunker with the clothes line and pelt him with
cream buns, the income is taxable. There is absolutely no doubt
about that, I'm afraid.
If you go onto
the HM Revenue &
Customs web site
and type the word "prostitution" into the search box you will
quickly find this:
If the
activities of a prostitute or any other person deriving income from
prostitution are organised in such a way as to constitute a trade
or profession, the profits are liable to income tax. This was
confirmed by the ‘Miss Whiplash’ case, CIR v Aken
[1990] 63TC395.
I've included an
account of this case, along with details of the other courtroom
adventures of Miss Whiplash (aka Lindi St Clair), in the
section The Miss Whiplash
cases.
Similarly The Polok case has confirmed that income from escorting is
VATable and a working girl needs to register for VAT if her takings
go over the VAT limit (recently increased to
£67,000).
|
|
But it can't be
taxable because ....
prostitution is illegal?
|
No it's not.
|
I work with another
girl so it is technically an illegal brothel?
|
And if a
shop-keeper sells fireworks to a child he is breaking the law but
his income is still taxable.
|
men pay me for
S&M services, which the 'Spanner' case decided is highly
illegal?
|
Even if you were
running a shop which specialised in receiving and selling stolen
property the profits would still be
taxable.
|
contracts for the
supply of prostitution are not legally enforceable so the income
cannot be taxable?
|
Barristers can't
sue for their fees either, but they still have to pay tax on their
income. And until recently gambling debts were not legally
enforceable, but bookies were still liable to
tax.
|
that would make the
tax man guilty of living off immoral earnings?
|
Now you're just
being silly. First of all the offence of living off immoral
earnings was abolished in 2003. And anyway it only ever applied to
men but HM Revenue & Customs isn't
human.
|
I provide therapeutic
massages which are exempt from VAT because they're a health
service?
|
OK if you're a
registered physiotherapist, or on the VATman's list of other
recognised health professionals. But is that really all you supply
because any incidental services would be
VATable?
|
I'm Lithuanian?
|
Su Naujaisiais
metais!
Makes no difference
I'm afraid. If you have a business in the UK you get to pay UK
tax.
|
|
|
The Revenue's
Business Income Manual talks about the activities of a prostitute
being taxable if they are "organised in such a way as to constitute
a trade or profession."
There is no single
definition of what constitutes trading but the following 'badges of
trade' would indicate that an escort is in business and therefore
liable to income tax:
-
An intention to make
money.
-
Transactions which are systematic and
repeated - for example having a web site which sets out how you
work, what you charge and what you provide, indicates that you
are trading.
-
A method of sale which is typical of
trading transactions - advertising, talking to potential customers,
giving a quote for the services required, taking a booking,
receiving the fee and finally doing the deed are all typical of
trading transactions.
-
The existence of similar trading
transactions - do other people in business provide similar services
in a similar way?
Basically if you set
yourself up in a businesslike way then you are trading. Or in the
words of Lord Reid in Ransom v Higgs (1974), trade means
“..operations of a commercial character by which the
trader provides to customers for reward some kind of goods or
services”
|
|
Here are a few
examples of activities which don't count as trading and won't be
taxable:
-
forced prostitution or sex slavery - a
girl who is pimped and working under compulsion is not doing it
with the intention of making money. She is the victim of a
crime.
-
the generous boyfriend - having a
boyfriend who settles your credit card bill every month and expects
nothing in return other than regular sex doesn't, on its own,
amount to trading. Having several relationships like that, probably
does.
-
casual bartering - occasionally asking
the guy next door if he'll clean out your guttering in return for a
shag doesn't amount to trading as a prostitute. Having a similar
arrangement with every tradesman in your village, possibly
does.
|
|
There is one final
reason why you might not be regarded as running a taxable business,
and that is if you were deemed to be employed rather than
self-employed. In practice it is almost inconceivable that anyone
providing personal sexual services could be treated as an employee
but there are a couple of issues to watch out
for.
The rules for deciding
whether someone is employed or self-employed are a mess and open to
interpretation. There is a popular misconception that if you and
the person you work for simply decide between yourselves that you
are self-employed then that is the end of the matter. It isn't. The
Revenue will look at the detail of your actual working relationship
and decide whether that amounts to employment or self- employment.
The basic difference is between a contact of service (employment)
and a contract for services (self-employment). If I agree to serve
you, in some kind of mistress-servant relationship, then I am your
employee (always assuming that you agree to pay me!), but if I
agree to handle your tax affairs then I am providing a service and
self- employed. Unfortunately things are often not that clear cut
and the courts have developed various pointers to help decide
whether a particular business relationship amounts to employment or
self- employment.
First of all, the easy
situations.
If you are an
independent escort who does her own advertising, works when she
wants, where she wants and has complete freedom to decide who she
sees and how much she charges, then there can be no doubt that you
are self- employed.
And at the other end
of the spectrum an un-pimped girl who works the streets is also
clearly self-employed.
It is possible that
an over-zealous tax inspector might try to argue that a girl
working in a brothel or an escort agency is really employed by the
brothel or the agency. HMRC publish a booklet (IR56) and an online
'Employment Status Indicator Tool' which are designed to weigh up
the various factors which indicate employment or self-employment.
However I'm not aware of any cases where the tax man has seriously
argued that an escort is employed - and that has got to be correct
because a sex-worker's absolute legal right to decide whether she
goes through with a booking trumps all the other considerations
about working to the agency rules, setting of prices and not be
able to swap the booking with another girl - all of which would
normally point to employment.
If you get work
through an agency then they will usually be very careful to make
sure the arrangement is structured so there is no doubt that you
are self-employed for tax purposes.
|
|
|
|
|